Evaluating your Partner's Performance

Today in class we are going to listen to a discussion for 5-10 min on each chapter (11 + 12).

During the conversation you are to take notes on:
- participation
Very good participation, he asked questions and he also answered most of the question.


- what questions/answers they ask
 how is Bruno's innocence raised in the chapter? he shows interest in them but it is the wrong interest, he compares the two symbols of the different races. He wishes he could wear his fathers Swastika and this shows his ignorance and innocence.
Andrews Question :If superiority wasn't in chapter 12 what would it be like? 
Do you think Bruno feels sorry for Shmuel in the prison and if not why? The only reason Bruno comes back to Shmuel to see him is that Shmuel might have an interest to see him everyday and that he is his only friend.
The last thing Bruno wanted to do was upset Shmuel. How is this ironic? When Shmuel asks him for food Bruno talks about his own life which Shmuel doesn't have anymore and tells Shmuel why his life is so bad, like his house sucks and there's no friends whereas Shmuel doesn't have these things either.
Was Hitler a bad person taking into account the Americans and the nuclear attack on Nagasaki and Hiroshima? Started the question but did not finish as bell rang.


do they know what they are talking about
Andrew has definitely read in depth of what the two chapters were about as he asked a very hard hitting and in depth question and answered the questions with confidence.



overall what is your impression of their understanding of what is happening in the chapter
it is obvious to me that Andrew has read the two chapters and has a good depth of understanding of both.
Give your partner an HONEST score out of 10 (10 being the best).


8.5